Guest post by Sammy McNally:
A complaint about the BBC Northern Ireland program ‘The Twelfth’ has been rejected by the BBC Trust (which operates independently from the BBC) on the grounds that although the annual Orange Order parade was ‘controversial’ it was not ‘highly controversial’ – and not a ‘major matter’. The complainant had argued that the BBC had broken its own guidelines on dealing with controversial subjects when covering last year’s 12th July parade in Belfast.
(Full judgement here) http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/appeals/esc_bulletins/2013/apr.pdf
Had the Trust determined that the parade was either ‘highly controversial’ or a ‘major matter’ then the long running (50 years) outside broadcast programme would have been in breach of the much more stringent requirements on impartiality – and the tone of the programme, which the complainant described as ‘promotional’ would have required revision.
It is an interesting decision by the Trust – who took the view that the spectacle of the parade in the centre of Belfast should be evaluated separately from incidents involving the controversy surrounding the marchers either on their way to or on their way back from the city centre.
In relation to the‘Ardoyne feeder parade’ the Trust found that – “although there was concern at the time about the return of the North Belfast feeder parade, the editorial focus of the programme was clearly the cultural and festive aspects of the parade itself as it passed through the very centre of Belfast.”
Similarly, in relation to the sectarian tune playing outside St Patricks Church the Trust took the view that the focus of program was the city centre and the controversy surrounding this incident was therefore not a significant factor in their decision.
The Trust also cited audience expectation in explaining its decision.
“given the long-standing nature of the programme, the audience would have had clear expectations about what the programme would cover, and the approach taken was consistent with that taken in previous years. “
What is (arguably) disconcerting about this decision by the Editorial Standard Committee of the BBC Trust is that BBC program makers can apparently sidestep the stringent requirements for impartiality by concentrating on those aspects of an event which are not‘highly controversial’ and sidestep the requirements for ‘signposting’controversial subjects on the basis that the audience are aware of the program content because it had been broadcast previously in a ‘similar format’.
It is difficult not to believe that the Trust might have taken a somewhat different line if a parade in London – which was viewed as sectarian/racist by about half the citizens of the city, required the presence of hundreds of riot police, which led to a serious deterioration in community and political relations over the following months because of a sectarian/racist incident, which went through areas where it was not welcome and where the parade organisers had been ambivalent about upholding the law – had been given similar promotional treatment by BBC London.
In fairness to BBC Northern Ireland, they have made it clear that “detailed discussion was taking place at a senior level about the nature of the coverage in 2013” and it will be interesting to see if the programme, shortly returning to our screens, provides what might fairly be described as a fuller and a more rounded view of the nature of the parade and its implications for public order and community relations.
In the ‘background’ details supplied as part of its judgement the BBC Trust notes that “In recent years, the Orange Order, with support from Belfast City Council, has sought to rebrand the day as “Orangefest”, an event for the whole community” and in fairness also to the Orange Order they have striven to move away from the more offensive trappings and associations of the parade.
…but the Orange Order are still some considerable distance away from convincing many people (and perhaps a majority of the citizens of Belfast) that they could ever stage an inclusive event devoid of triumphalism and sectrainism – given the political and religious objectives of the organisation – but it is to be hoped (if not now expected) that BBC Northern Ireland would reflect that particular reality in its program coverage.
carrickally said:
“Nope, I’ve no idea who put them up but they are unquestionably UVF and OO flags side by side and put up at the same time. I can take pics if required, would the local lodge have a comment or should people draw the obvious conclusions?”
What’s the obvious conclusion? Is it that after removing their white pillowcases, the members of lodges in Bangor got on their wooly faces and stuck up all the flegs from China they could locate in their illegal drug and drink shebeen?
Come on BD, you’re better than that!
LikeLike
bangordub said:
Carrickally,
Fair enough, expressed badly on my part. I was referring to the implied association of the two organisations by the flagsters. I am not implying the two organisations are actually linked. Sammy puts it very well below.
What I was trying to ask was should the OO not dissociate themselves from such activities? Images such as the boys on the balcony at Clifton St Orange hall or the songbooks of certain bands or the behaviour of certain individuals attending marches do the OO no favours in my opinion.
LikeLike
sammymcnally said:
Peter,
perhaps there is already such a thing in place? But if not, maybe the Orange order should have a firm statment on the subject of flags on its website which makes it clear that paramilitiary flags should not be erected along with/in conjunction with (or whatever form of words) Orange Order flags and asking those involved to desist.
They could perhaps also make it clear on their website that effigy/symbol burning(of those effigies/symbols which are associated with the Nat community*) which has long been associated with the holiday period of the 12th is not something the Order either supports or welcomes as they recognise that it damages (by association) the Orange Order and contributes negatively to community relations.
*Not sure anyone is concerned about the boy Lundy going up in smoke.
LikeLike
bangordub said:
Sammy,
Regarding the BBC coverage, I think the OO would much rather be a “feature” than a “News item”. That is at the heart of their dilemma.
LikeLike
Peter Brown said:
Bangordub
It was not you personally – its not your flag (that is a whole other debate!?) it was those whose flag is displayed irrespective of their involvement in the display – poorly phrased perhaps?
LikeLike
bangordub said:
Peter,
Ok, agree with that. It upsets me if the tricolour is misused.
Fermanagh seems to have a decent solution. County bunting and flags when the GAA team is playing promptly removed in Enniskillen, same during July for the Orange parades. Simples.
LikeLike
bangordub said:
Update 14 June: It is notable that I observed today that the UVF etc flags have been removed from proximity to the Orange Order Flags in Bangor. I don’t know if some readers here or the local lodge have had a word but someone certainly has. Still, a welcome development in my opinion.
LikeLike
Fear Feirsteach said:
So the UVF flags are still there but they have been moved away from the Orange flags in order to create the impression there is no link between the two?
LikeLike
bangordub said:
Correct FF, interesting?
LikeLike
Fear Feirsteach said:
In so much as flegging is interesting this is interesting. Why would people engage in such strange behaviour?
LikeLike
Peter Brown said:
No blog on Gerry Kelly’s trip on a landrover? Some balance needed surely ;-p
LikeLike
bangordub said:
Fair enough!
LikeLike
Pingback: A little Drum Roll for “our wee Blog” | "We in coming days may be"